java-threads mailing list archive (by date)

• Thread Index

• Process Algebra question
  From Campbell, John at Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:30:52 +0100
• RE: JCSP Network Edition
  From Chalmers, Kevin at Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:30:50 +0100
• Re: JCSP Network Edition
  From Sachin Desai at Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:01:53 +0100
• RE: JCSP Network Edition
  From Chalmers, Kevin at Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:30:33 +0100
• JCSP Network Edition
  From Sachin Desai at Wed, 18 Jul 2007 07:30:29 +0100
• Occam & Neural Nets
  From Anne van Rossum at Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:30:46 +0100
• Re: More multi-core
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:00:45 +0100
• More multi-core
  From Barry Cook at Wed, 04 Jul 2007 10:00:32 +0100
• Parallel Processing Considered Not Harmful
  From Barry Cook at Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:30:34 +0100
• A set of Transputing '91 available...
  From Dyke Stiles at Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:30:52 +0100
• Call for participation: CPA 2007
  From A.Mcewan at Tue, 22 May 2007 10:00:45 +0100
• Call for Chapters: Process algebra book
  From Bill Gardner at Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:26:40 +0100
• Automatic refinement-checking of CSP processes with infinite state-spaces
  From Allan McInnes at Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:22:23 +0100
• FCS'07 special session: call for papers
  From Marc L. Smith at Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:23:37 +0000
• Re: Concurrent programming coming to JavaScript
  From Anne van Rossum at Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:46:11 +0000
• Re: Concurrent programming coming to JavaScript
  From Allan McInnes at Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:09:51 +0000
• Re: Concurrent programming coming to JavaScript
  From Marc L . Smith at Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:34:18 +0000
• Re: Concurrent programming coming to JavaScript
  From Claude Petitpierre at Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:44:01 +0000
• Re: Concurrent programming coming to JavaScript
  From Barry Cook at Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:08:57 +0000
• Re: Concurrent programming coming to JavaScript
  From Allan McInnes at Thu, 22 Feb 2007 03:24:14 +0000
• CPA 2007 - Final Call for Papers
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:39:24 +0000
• RE: protocol standards that use formal specification of behavior?
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:49:30 +0000
• RE: protocol standards that use formal specification of behavior?
  From tjoccam at Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:12:22 +0000
• Re: protocol standards that use formal specification of behavior?
  From Allan McInnes at Wed, 24 Jan 2007 05:34:09 +0000
• Re: protocol standards that use formal specification of behavior?
  From Alan Grover at Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:32:06 +0000
• Re: protocol standards that use formal specification of behavior?
  From Torben Hoffmann at Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:11:39 +0000
• Re: protocol standards that use formal specification of behavior?
  From Allan McInnes at Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:02:56 +0000
• protocol standards that use formal specification of behavior?
  From Alan Grover at Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:42:35 +0000
• 2nd CFP: CPA2007, and invited speaker announcement
  From A.Mcewan at Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:27:08 +0000
• CPA2007 Document Template
  From Chalmers, Kevin at Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:44:54 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Initial Questions
  From oyvind . teig at Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:09:22 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Initial Questions
  From Anne van Rossum at Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:11:53 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Initial Questions
  From oyvind . teig at Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:52:04 +0000
• Re: Generics
  From Kevin Chalmers at Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:42:12 +0000
• Re: Generics
  From Neil Brown at Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:27:05 +0000
• Generics
  From Anne van Rossum at Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:46:13 +0000
• multiway sync guards (AltingBarriers)
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:45:37 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Interpreter (& too restricted visibility of classes in JCSP package)
  From Kevin Chalmers at Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:15:12 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Interpreter (& too restricted visibility of classes in JCSP package)
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:34:03 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Interpreter (& too restricted visibility of classes in JCSP package)
  From Kevin Chalmers at Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:56:10 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Interpreter (& too restricted visibility of classes in JCSP package)
  From Neil Brown at Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:49:49 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Interpreter (& too restricted visibility of classes in JCSP package)
  From Kevin Chalmers at Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:24:28 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Initial Questions
  From Anne van Rossum at Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:52:46 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Interpreter (& too restricted visibility of classes in JCSP package)
  From Anne van Rossum at Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:42:09 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Interpreter (& too restricted visibility of classes in JCSP package)
  From Neil Brown at Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:27:59 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Interpreter (& too restricted visibility of classes in JCSP package)
  From Kevin Chalmers at Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:19:08 +0000
• JCSP - Interpreter (& too restricted visibility of classes in JCSP package)
  From Anne van Rossum at Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:51:03 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Initial Questions
  From tjoccam at Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:37:42 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Initial Questions
  From Kevin Chalmers at Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:34:00 +0000
• Re: JCSP - Initial Questions
  From Neil Brown at Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:05:41 +0000
• JCSP - Initial Questions
  From Anne van Rossum at Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:42:39 +0000
• [CFP] Application of Concurrency to System Design, ACSD 2007
  From Basten, A.A. at Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:31:20 +0000
• CFP: CPA 2007
  From A.Mcewan at Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:25:09 +0000
• CPA 2001 Proceedings
  From Chalmers, Kevin at Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:54:07 +0000
• [Call for papers] ACSD 2007
  From Basten, A.A. at Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:20:53 +0100
• jcsp.mobile
  From Chalmers, Kevin at Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:09:52 +0100
• CPA 2006 (afterwards)
  From P.H.Welch at Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:47:59 +0100
• Calls for Papers
  From Kevin Chalmers at Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:04:56 +0100
• Re: Yet another article on the need for better parallel.
  From tjoccam at Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:47:51 +0100
• RE: Yet another article on the need for better parallel.
  From Tony Gore at Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:20:50 +0100
• Yet another article on the need for better parallel.
  From Kevin Chalmers at Sun, 17 Sep 2006 03:19:30 +0100
• CPA 2006 Fringe Programme
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:01:09 +0100
• Re: TechEd 2006 -- "parallelism is the new OO"
  From Joe Bowbeer at Sun, 03 Sep 2006 05:47:36 +0100
• RE: TechEd 2006 -- "parallelism is the new OO"
  From Chalmers, Kevin at Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:27:36 +0100
• RE: TechEd 2006 -- "parallelism is the new OO"
  From Denis A Nicole at Sat, 02 Sep 2006 20:04:58 +0100
• RE: TechEd 2006 -- "parallelism is the new OO"
  From P.H.Welch at Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:34:06 +0100
• RA position in concurrent OS development at Kent
  From Fred Barnes at Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:03:53 +0100
• Re: CPA 2006: Fringe programme
  From P.H.Welch at Sat, 19 Aug 2006 18:19:15 +0100
• CPA 2006: Fringe programme
  From P.H.Welch at Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:56:31 +0100
• CPA 2006: call-for-participants
  From P.H.Welch at Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:44:58 +0100
• MS DSL designers
  From Alan Grover at Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:30:20 +0100
• Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From Joe Bowbeer at Thu, 13 Jul 2006 03:24:36 +0100
• Re: Intel: timely article
  From Barry Cook at Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:22:22 +0100
• Re: Intel: timely article
  From Fred Barnes at Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:17:41 +0100
• Re: Intel: timely article
  From tjoccam at Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:06:56 +0100
• Re: Intel: timely article
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:36:44 +0100
• RE: Intel: timely article
  From Allan McInnes at Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:15:59 +0100
• Re: Intel: timely article
  From Barry Cook at Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:08:32 +0100
• RE: Intel: timely article
  From Chalmers, Kevin at Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:36:52 +0100
• Re: Intel: timely article
  From Paul Walker at Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:58:48 +0100
• Re: Intel: timely article
  From Barry Cook at Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:14:33 +0100
• RE: Intel: timely article
  From tjoccam at Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:09:05 +0100
• RE: Intel: timely article
  From Allan McInnes at Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:30:44 +0100
• RE: Intel: timely article
  From neil at Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:09:45 +0100
• RE: Intel: timely article
  From Tony Gore at Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:39:22 +0100
• RE: Intel: timely article
  From Chalmers, Kevin at Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:14:05 +0100
• RE: Intel: timely article
  From Tony Gore at Tue, 27 Jun 2006 09:06:55 +0100
• Intel: timely article
  From Marc L. Smith at Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:43:41 +0100
• Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From Mario Schweigler at Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:19:06 +0100
• Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From Mario Schweigler at Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:41:44 +0100
• Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From Joe Bowbeer at Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:08:42 +0100
• RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From tjoccam at Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:29:43 +0100
• RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From tjoccam at Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:53:09 +0100
• RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From Allan McInnes at Sun, 25 Jun 2006 19:45:42 +0100
• RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From tjoccam at Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:28:20 +0100
• RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From tjoccam at Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:15:28 +0100
• Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From tjoccam at Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:34:06 +0100
• Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From F.R.M.Barnes at Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:07:40 +0100
• RE: AW: The world needs process-orientation
  From tjoccam at Thu, 15 Jun 2006 23:12:57 +0100
• Re: AW: The world needs process-orientation
  From Joe Bowbeer at Thu, 15 Jun 2006 20:00:47 +0100
• RE: AW: The world needs process-orientation
  From tjoccam at Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:07:10 +0100
• RE: AW: The world needs process-orientation
  From Kerridge, Jon at Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:50:59 +0100
• RE: The world needs process-orientation
  From Hoffmann Torben-CTOH001 at Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:36:30 +0100
• RE: AW: The world needs process-orientation
  From Tony Gore at Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:36:11 +0100
• Re: AW: The world needs process-orientation
  From tjoccam at Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:26:24 +0100
• Re: The world needs process-orientation
  From Lawrence Dickson at Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:11:17 +0100
• Re: The world needs process-orientation
  From Claude Petitpierre at Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:48:05 +0100
• RE: The world needs process-orientation
  From Allan McInnes at Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:52:18 +0100
• occam-pi.org and mailing list archives
  From Adam Sampson at Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:06:21 +0100
• Re: The world needs process-orientation
  From Joe Bowbeer at Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:02:27 +0100
• RE: The world needs process-orientation
  From tjoccam at Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:42:05 +0100
• RE: The world needs process-orientation
  From Hoffmann Torben-CTOH001 at Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:40:46 +0100
• RE: The world needs process-orientation
  From tjoccam at Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:51:51 +0100
• Re: The world needs process-orientation
  From Allan McInnes at Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:52:46 +0100
• RE: The world needs process-orientation
  From tjoccam at Sat, 10 Jun 2006 17:00:15 +0100
• RE: The world needs process-orientation
  From neil at Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:56:33 +0100
• Re: The world needs process-orientation
  From Marc L. Smith at Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:33:34 +0100
• RE: The world needs process-orientation
  From neil at Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:32:22 +0100
• Re: The world needs process-orientation
  From tjoccam at Fri, 09 Jun 2006 21:26:46 +0100
• Re: CPA 2006 - Call for Papers
  From A.E.Lawrence at Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:25:06 +0100
• Re: CPA 2006 - Call for Papers
  From Denis A Nicole at Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:25:21 +0100
• The world needs process-orientation
  From neil at Fri, 09 Jun 2006 10:18:52 +0100
• Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From Jim Davies at Fri, 09 Jun 2006 09:50:53 +0100
• RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From tjoccam at Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:02:40 +0100
• RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From Ian Phillips at Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:27:29 +0100
• Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From Joe Bowbeer at Thu, 08 Jun 2006 20:17:36 +0100
• RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From Allan McInnes at Thu, 08 Jun 2006 17:14:43 +0100
• Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From Jim Davies at Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:35:17 +0100
• RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From neil at Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:17:09 +0100
• Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  From tjoccam at Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:14:03 +0100
• CPA 2006 !
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 18 May 2006 13:58:06 +0100
• CPA 2006 - Call for Papers!
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 17 May 2006 15:56:16 +0100
• CPA 2006, Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:25:41 +0100
• Elegant ending of processes
  From Neil Brown at Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:31:32 +0000
• Re: jcsp Parallel doesn't handle Error cleanly
  From Bernhard Sputh at Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:55:09 +0000
• Re: jcsp Parallel doesn't handle Error cleanly
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:58:15 +0000
• jcsp Parallel doesn't handle Error cleanly
  From Rick Beton at Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:28:00 +0000
• Call For Papers: 2006 PDPTA, ICAI, SERP + more (28 joint conferences); Las Vegas, USA, June 2006
  From hra at Sun, 13 Nov 2005 22:03:50 +0000
• Re: C. A. R. Hoares influence at MS-Research?
  From Marc L. Smith at Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:28:22 +0000
• C. A. R. Hoares influence at MS-Research?
  From Bernhard Sputh at Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:51:49 +0000
• Re: CPA 2005 - last call & the Fringe
  From Neil Brown at Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:45:11 +0100
• CPA 2005 - last call & the Fringe
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:01:56 +0100
• Call for Delegates Communicating Process Architectures 2005 at Eindhoven
  From Herman Roebbers at Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:19:23 +0100
• CSP for Java Programmers
  From Allan McInnes at Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:27:26 +0100
• Call For Papers: June 2005, Las Vegas, USA, Applied Computing + Computer Science & Engineering
  From hra at Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:59:30 +0100
• CfP Communicating Process Architectures 2005
  From Herman Roebbers at Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:33:00 +0000
• Call For Papers: 30 Joint Conferences in CS & CE; June 2005, Las Vegas, USA
  From hra at Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:58:40 +0000
• PhD studentships available
  From Alastair Allen at Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:03:32 +0100
• [announce] KRoC/Linux 1.3.3 released!
  From Fred Barnes at Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:01:18 +0100
• CPA 2004 programme and registration
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 03 Aug 2004 19:28:14 +0100
• Java theory and practice: Fixing the Java Memory Model
  From Beton, Richard at Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:05:59 +0000
• Re: Sun JSR 166 - Concurrency Utilities
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 13 Oct 2003 20:03:46 +0100
• Re: Sun JSR 166 - Concurrency Utilities
  From Doug Lea at Sat, 11 Oct 2003 14:39:51 +0100
• Re: Sun JSR 166 - Concurrency Utilities
  From Beton, Richard at Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:22:03 +0100
• Re: Sun JSR 166 - Concurrency Utilities: Quick overview
  From Dyke Stiles at Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:31:03 +0100
• Re: Sun JSR 166 - Concurrency Utilities
  From Doug Lea at Thu, 09 Oct 2003 11:22:47 +0100
• Re: Sun JSR 166 - Concurrency Utilities
  From Beton, Richard at Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:36:53 +0100
• Introducing Spin.
  From A E Lawrence at Sat, 20 Sep 2003 12:04:52 +0100
• Re: CPA-2003 Tutorial on CSP available.
  From A E Lawrence at Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:38:56 +0100
• CSPP preprint
  From A E Lawrence at Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:24:03 +0100
• CPA-2003 Tutorial on CSP available.
  From A E Lawrence at Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:46:56 +0100
• RE: Missing characters in CPA-2003 paper
  From Broenink, J.F. at Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:03:35 +0100
• Sun JSR 166 - Concurrency Utilities
  From Beton, Richard at Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:27:56 +0100
• CSTimer API
  From Beton, Richard at Mon, 07 Jul 2003 13:30:03 +0100
• Re: Why Events Are A Bad Idea (for High-concurrency Servers)
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:10:59 +0100
• Re: Why Events Are A Bad Idea (for High-concurrency Servers)
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:38:23 +0100
• Why Events Are A Bad Idea (for High-concurrency Servers)
  From Beton, Richard at Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:55:02 +0100
• 2nd Call for Papers CPA conference, 7-10 Sept, Enschede Netherlan ds; Poster Available
  From Broenink, J.F. at Fri, 09 May 2003 16:20:54 +0100
• 2003 Int'l Conf. in CS & CE - Las Vegas, June 23-26, 2003
  From Hamid Arabnia at Sun, 20 Apr 2003 19:58:26 +0100
• CSP book on-line
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 07 Apr 2003 16:44:33 +0100
• Call for Papers for CPA 2003 workshop on 7-10 sept 2003 in Enschede, Nehterlands
  From CPA2003 at Thu, 20 Mar 2003 21:06:55 +0000
• Call for Papers for CPA 2003 workshop on 7-10 sept 2003 in Ensche de, Netherlands
  From Broenink, J.F. at Thu, 20 Mar 2003 21:03:03 +0000
• Call for Papers for CPA 2003 workshop on 7-10 sept 2003 in Ensche de, Nehterlands
  From Broenink, J.F. at Thu, 20 Mar 2003 20:53:40 +0000
• Re: No message for 6 months
  From Ruth Ivimey-Cook at Sat, 08 Mar 2003 08:55:37 +0000
• Polling sockets - home-made ALT
  From Beton, Richard at Fri, 07 Mar 2003 17:12:51 +0000
• Re: No message for 6 months
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 07 Mar 2003 13:38:57 +0000
• Re: No message for 6 months
  From Beton, Richard at Fri, 07 Mar 2003 10:41:03 +0000
• Re: Why to interrupt blocked socket? - Re: No message for 6 months
  From Shengru Tu at Fri, 07 Mar 2003 06:44:52 +0000
• ICoTec
  From marcel . boosten at Fri, 07 Mar 2003 06:19:28 +0000
• Re: Why to interrupt blocked socket? - Re: No message for 6 months
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:51:19 +0000
• Why to interrupt blocked socket? - Re: No message for 6 months
  From Shengru Tu at Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:31:50 +0000
• Re: No message for 6 months
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:19:28 +0000
• Re: No message for 6 months
  From Beton, Richard at Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:05:19 +0000
• Re: No message for 6 months
  From Beton, Richard at Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:01:49 +0000
• Re: No message for 6 months
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 06 Mar 2003 16:46:31 +0000
• Call for Papers: Java in Education session
  From Dyke Stiles at Wed, 29 Jan 2003 14:13:13 +0000
• Call For Papers: 2003 Int'l Joint Conf. on CS and CE - Las Vegas, June 23, 2003
  From Hamid Arabnia at Fri, 01 Nov 2002 16:44:24 +0000
• FW: Quickstone Technologies Product Update.
  From Jim Moores at Tue, 20 Aug 2002 09:48:48 +0100
• RE: Kristen Nygard - RIP
  From Andrzej Lewandowski at Fri, 16 Aug 2002 01:50:41 +0100
• Kristen Nygard - RIP
  From Øyvind Teig at Mon, 12 Aug 2002 07:59:12 +0100
• Re: CPA 2002 REGISTRATION
  From James Pascoe at Wed, 07 Aug 2002 12:33:33 +0100
• CPA 2002 REGISTRATION
  From James Pascoe at Mon, 05 Aug 2002 15:14:49 +0100
• CPA-2002 programme
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 29 Jul 2002 20:18:33 +0100
• IPDPS Call For Papers...
  From Dyke Stiles at Mon, 01 Jul 2002 22:14:17 +0100
• CPA 2002 DEADLINE APPROACHING
  From James Pascoe at Fri, 07 Jun 2002 13:33:12 +0100
• CPA 2002 DATE REMINDER
  From James Pascoe at Tue, 28 May 2002 11:58:19 +0100
• CPA-2002, IEE and BCS
  From James Pascoe at Mon, 27 May 2002 16:09:59 +0100
• RE: JCSP Network Edition
  From Jim at Wed, 01 May 2002 11:12:22 +0100
• JCSP Network Edition
  From Jim at Wed, 01 May 2002 10:01:09 +0100
• Re: JCSP Network Edition now available from Quickstone Technologies Limited.
  From Mario Schweigler at Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:32:58 +0100
• RE: JCSP Network Edition now available from Quickstone Technologi es Limited.
  From Lewandowski, Andrzej at Tue, 30 Apr 2002 21:01:32 +0100
• Re: JCSP Network Edition now available from Quickstone Technologies Limited.
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 30 Apr 2002 20:24:47 +0100
• Parallel Computing and the Computer Science Curriculum
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:05:06 +0100
• Re: News from a MS researcher
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 26 Apr 2002 17:49:58 +0100
• RE: JCSP Network Edition now available from Quickstone Technologi es Limited.
  From Lewandowski, Andrzej at Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:40:25 +0100
• Re: News from a MS researcher
  From Gordon Hutchison at Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:29:23 +0100
• JCSP Network Edition now available from Quickstone Technologies Limited.
  From Jim at Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:08:30 +0100
• News from a MS researcher
  From Paddy Nixon at Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:05:06 +0100
• CPA LEAFLETS
  From James Pascoe at Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:15:08 +0100
• Re: CPA 2002 LEAFLETS
  From A E Lawrence at Fri, 05 Apr 2002 23:12:09 +0100
• RE: CPA 2002 LEAFLETS
  From James Pascoe at Fri, 05 Apr 2002 21:30:02 +0100
• RE: CPA 2002 LEAFLETS
  From Andrzej Lewandowski at Fri, 05 Apr 2002 20:40:14 +0100
• Re: CPA 2002 LEAFLETS
  From Ruth Ivimey-Cook at Fri, 05 Apr 2002 17:00:17 +0100
• CPA 2002 LEAFLETS
  From James Pascoe at Fri, 05 Apr 2002 16:21:35 +0100
• WoTUG WEB SITE AFFILIATIONS
  From James Pascoe at Fri, 05 Apr 2002 14:53:22 +0100
• CSP examples needed...
  From Geraldo Pereira de Souza at Thu, 28 Mar 2002 22:13:28 +0000
• Re: Distributed application using CTJ???
  From Gordon Hutchison at Fri, 15 Mar 2002 09:43:53 +0000
• Re: Distributed application using CTJ???
  From johan . sunter at Fri, 15 Mar 2002 08:28:57 +0000
• Distributed application using CTJ???
  From Geraldo Pereira de Souza at Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:14:42 +0000
• Application-Specific Multi-Processor SoC ... No WoTUG?
  From Ian Phillips at Sat, 02 Mar 2002 10:11:42 +0000
• Re: OO&CSP
  From Lawrence Dickson at Mon, 11 Feb 2002 22:44:45 +0000
• Re: OO&CSP
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:21:27 +0000
• RE: Emperor's new clothes - ACM followup.
  From Andrzej Lewandowski at Fri, 08 Feb 2002 23:26:22 +0000
• RE: Emperor's new clothes - ACM followup.
  From Lawrence Dickson at Fri, 08 Feb 2002 20:16:11 +0000
• RE: Emperor's new clothes - ACM followup.
  From Andrzej Lewandowski at Wed, 06 Feb 2002 12:15:40 +0000
• Re: Emperor's new clothes - ACM followup.
  From Jim Davies at Tue, 05 Feb 2002 12:11:26 +0000
• Re: Emperor's new clothes - ACM followup.
  From Lawrence Dickson at Mon, 04 Feb 2002 23:33:17 +0000
• Re: Emperor's new clothes - ACM followup.
  From Jim Davies at Mon, 04 Feb 2002 19:59:16 +0000
• RE: Emperor's new clothes - ACM followup.
  From Lewandowski, Andrzej at Mon, 04 Feb 2002 19:00:45 +0000
• Emperor's new clothes - ACM followup.
  From Dyke Stiles at Mon, 04 Feb 2002 17:52:09 +0000
• RE: JCSP and realtime java processors.
  From Stephen Maudsley at Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:06:05 +0000
• Re: FYI...
  From Richard Meester at Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:25:38 +0000
• RE: FYI...
  From Andrzej Lewandowski at Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:45:15 +0000
• FYI...
  From Dyke Stiles at Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:33:59 +0000
• Re: JCSP and realtime java processors.
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:06:12 +0000
• JCSP and realtime java processors.
  From Richard Meester at Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:08:48 +0000
• UML and all that
  From Richard Beton at Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:02:42 +0000
• Re: [JSR 166 (Concurrency utilities)]
  From Doug Lea at Sat, 26 Jan 2002 21:36:03 +0000
• Re: [JSR 166 (Concurrency utilities)]
  From Joseph Bowbeer at Sat, 26 Jan 2002 21:34:38 +0000
• Re: [JSR 166 (Concurrency utilities)]
  From Olivier Lefevre at Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:48:55 +0000
• JSR 166 (Concurrency utilities)
  From Doug Lea at Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:15:38 +0000
• Re: Java IDE?
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 08 Jan 2002 18:28:20 +0000
• HPC in CSA
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 03 Jan 2002 15:23:01 +0000
• 2002 Int'l. Joint Conferences in Computer Science & Engineering; Las Vegas, June 24-27, 2002
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 17 Dec 2001 11:15:19 +0000
• Re: Another opportunity for world domination
  From Paddy Nixon at Fri, 14 Dec 2001 16:41:29 +0000
• Re: Another opportunity for world domination
  From Dyke Stiles at Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:27:39 +0000
• Another opportunity for world domination
  From Paddy Nixon at Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:13:56 +0000
• Re: Re. transputer designer?
  From Roy Wilson at Thu, 29 Nov 2001 01:23:55 +0000
• Re. transputer designer?
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:58:04 +0000
• Re: transputer designer?
  From A E Lawrence at Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:57:35 +0000
• Re: transputer designer?
  From Paul Walker at Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:55:16 +0000
• transputer designer?
  From Campbell, John at Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:05:26 +0000
• Re: Browser client side scripts
  From Paddy Nixon at Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:26:54 +0000
• Browser client side scripts
  From Øyvind Teig at Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:46:21 +0000
• Re: CSP, JMM and better processor architectures
  From Denis A Nicole at Fri, 02 Nov 2001 08:01:34 +0000
• Re: CSP/JCSP Tutorial at PDPTA 2001
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:46:15 +0000
• Re: CSP/JCSP Tutorial at PDPTA 2001
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 30 Oct 2001 19:25:19 +0000
• Re: CSP/JCSP Tutorial at PDPTA 2001
  From Owen Cheng at Mon, 29 Oct 2001 20:05:02 +0000
• Another Helping of CPA ?
  From James Pascoe at Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:02:49 +0000
• FW: [Jikes-dev] IBM releases Jikes Research Virtual Machine on developerworks
  From Campbell, John at Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:10:00 +0100
• Re: IE and Java plugin 1.3.1
  From Mario Schweigler at Tue, 16 Oct 2001 01:32:16 +0100
• RE: CSP and Isolates
  From Tony Gore at Sun, 14 Oct 2001 18:32:46 +0100
• Re: CSP, JMM and better processor architectures
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:11:32 +0100
• RE: CSP and Isolates
  From Hilderink, G.H. at Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:05:41 +0100
• Re: CSP, JMM and better processor architectures
  From Richard Miller at Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:38:58 +0100
• Re: CSP and Isolates
  From Doug Lea at Fri, 12 Oct 2001 13:05:00 +0100
• Re: Ledgard on OO
  From G.S.Stiles at Fri, 12 Oct 2001 06:00:31 +0100
• CSP and Isolates
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 12 Oct 2001 00:17:29 +0100
• CSP, JMM and better processor architectures
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 12 Oct 2001 00:11:15 +0100
• CSP and the middle ground
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 12 Oct 2001 00:03:51 +0100
• Seen 'through a glass darkly'
  From oyvind . teig at Thu, 11 Oct 2001 08:08:06 +0100
• RE: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From johan . sunter at Wed, 10 Oct 2001 07:44:08 +0100
• RE: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From Lawrence Dickson at Tue, 09 Oct 2001 23:44:23 +0100
• Re: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From IanPage99 at Tue, 09 Oct 2001 21:24:31 +0100
• RE: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From Gerald Hilderink at Tue, 09 Oct 2001 20:23:10 +0100
• Re: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From Lawrence Dickson at Tue, 09 Oct 2001 16:52:50 +0100
• RE: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 09 Oct 2001 15:22:27 +0100
• RE: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From Andrzej Lewandowski at Tue, 09 Oct 2001 13:36:13 +0100
• Re: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From IanPage99 at Tue, 09 Oct 2001 12:27:20 +0100
• Re: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 08 Oct 2001 13:41:30 +0100
• Re: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From oyvind . teig at Mon, 08 Oct 2001 08:50:10 +0100
• Re: Call for papers: PDPTA 2002
  From Roy Wilson at Sat, 06 Oct 2001 01:27:10 +0100
• Re: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From p0072370 at Fri, 05 Oct 2001 18:07:39 +0100
• Re: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 05 Oct 2001 16:58:58 +0100
• Re: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From p0072370 at Fri, 05 Oct 2001 13:11:22 +0100
• Re: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From Lawrence Dickson at Thu, 04 Oct 2001 16:57:01 +0100
• Re: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 04 Oct 2001 14:19:48 +0100
• Re: Objects, processes, and encapsulation
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:36:00 +0100
• Re: CPA: Where to publish?
  From Nan C Schaller at Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:33:43 +0100
• Re: Thanks ...
  From johan . sunter at Mon, 24 Sep 2001 09:42:09 +0100
• Re: CPA: Where to publish?
  From johan . sunter at Mon, 24 Sep 2001 08:01:10 +0100
• Thanks ...
  From P.H.Welch at Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:20:19 +0100
• Mental Models and the JMM
  From Gordon Hutchison at Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:06:02 +0100
• RE: The future of CSP? (OO & CSP)
  From Hilderink, G.H. at Fri, 21 Sep 2001 14:28:07 +0100
• RE: The future of CSP? (OO & CSP)
  From Doug Lea at Fri, 21 Sep 2001 12:04:54 +0100
• RE: The future of CSP? (OO & CSP)
  From Gerald Hilderink at Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:56:53 +0100
• "Fringe" papers...
  From Alan Chalmers at Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:15:48 +0100
• RE: Concurrency, Exceptions and Poison
  From Campbell, John at Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:47:05 +0100
• Re: Concurrency, Exceptions and Poison
  From ianeast at Mon, 10 Sep 2001 18:07:55 +0100
• Please don't add old mail context all the time
  From oyvind . teig at Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:01:39 +0100
• RE: Concurrency, Exceptions and Poison
  From Gerald Hilderink at Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:10:09 +0100
• Concurrency, Exceptions and Poison
  From P . H . Welch at Sun, 09 Sep 2001 14:33:57 +0100
• Re: CSP Mailinglist Problems
  From P . H . Welch at Sun, 09 Sep 2001 14:31:42 +0100
• Re: UML and concurrency: how to get started?
  From A E Lawrence at Sun, 09 Sep 2001 12:34:24 +0100
• Re: The future of CSP? Fault tolerant implementations?
  From marcel . boosten at Sat, 08 Sep 2001 01:00:09 +0100
• RE: Commercial backing? No way!
  From Gerald Hilderink at Sat, 08 Sep 2001 00:58:06 +0100
• Re: UML and concurrency: how to get started?
  From marcel . boosten at Sat, 08 Sep 2001 00:50:03 +0100
• CSP Mailinglist Problems
  From marcel . boosten at Sat, 08 Sep 2001 00:50:02 +0100
• Re: The future of CSP? Fault tolerant implementations?
  From G. S. Stiles at Wed, 05 Sep 2001 05:02:52 +0100
• UML and concurrency: how to get started?
  From Jeremy Martin at Tue, 04 Sep 2001 13:27:43 +0100
• Re: The future of CSP? (OO & CSP)
  From G. S. Stiles at Mon, 03 Sep 2001 21:36:20 +0100
• RE: Poison
  From Gerald Hilderink at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:50:41 +0100
• RE: Poison
  From Gerald Hilderink at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:38:56 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From Lawrence Dickson at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:27:29 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From ianeast at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 16:31:18 +0100
• Re: Philosophy
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 15:13:55 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From P . H . Welch at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 15:07:48 +0100
• [no subject]
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 14:52:45 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From A E Lawrence at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:17:46 +0100
• RE: Poison
  From P . H . Welch at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:02:32 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From P . H . Welch at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:58:15 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 11:43:41 +0100
• RE: Poison
  From Gerald Hilderink at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 10:51:05 +0100
• Philosophy
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 09:41:54 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 26 Jul 2001 09:12:44 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From oyvind . teig at Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:28:06 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From P . H . Welch at Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:20:52 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From Lawrence Dickson at Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:04:44 +0100
• CPA-2001 Call for Delegates
  From P . H . Welch at Fri, 20 Jul 2001 15:29:39 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From M_Boosten at Fri, 20 Jul 2001 13:18:48 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From P . H . Welch at Fri, 20 Jul 2001 12:18:32 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From M_Boosten at Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:37:35 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From A E Lawrence at Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:21:51 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From Beton, Richard at Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:55:25 +0100
• RE: Poison
  From Campbell, John at Thu, 19 Jul 2001 23:26:36 +0100
• RE: Poison
  From Campbell, John at Thu, 19 Jul 2001 22:55:06 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From Lawrence Dickson at Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:47:27 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From Beton, Richard at Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:28:15 +0100
• RE: Poison
  From Campbell, John at Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:49:20 +0100
• FW: Poison
  From Gerald Hilderink at Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:41:52 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:05:23 +0100
• RE: Poison
  From Campbell, John at Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:09:10 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From P . H . Welch at Wed, 18 Jul 2001 18:44:53 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From P . H . Welch at Wed, 18 Jul 2001 18:40:13 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From Lawrence Dickson at Wed, 18 Jul 2001 16:55:33 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From M_Boosten at Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:10:39 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From P . H . Welch at Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:54:05 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From M_Boosten at Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:24:56 +0100
• Re: Poison
  From P . H . Welch at Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:53:24 +0100
• Poison
  From M_Boosten at Wed, 18 Jul 2001 08:39:07 +0100
• New JCSP release
  From P . H . Welch at Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:24:11 +0100
• lecturerships
  From Jim Davies at Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:11:07 +0100
• CSP for the masses
  From Steve Parker at Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:01:05 +0100
• Re: Brinch Hansen's frustration
  From oyvind . teig at Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:05:15 +0100
• Brinch Hansen's frustration
  From oyvind . teig at Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:38:45 +0100
• Re: VIRUS! Homepage
  From Andrew Boden at Mon, 14 May 2001 04:18:27 +0100
• RE: Micron...
  From O'Neill, Brian at Thu, 12 Apr 2001 10:02:25 +0100
• Micron...
  From Dyke Stiles at Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:15:36 +0100
• Re: Comms warm a bit to reconfigurable processor
  From A E Lawrence at Fri, 30 Mar 2001 21:03:06 +0100
• Comms warm a bit to reconfigurable processor
  From G. S. Stiles at Fri, 30 Mar 2001 03:43:05 +0100
• RE: Demonstration application
  From Stephen Maudsley at Fri, 16 Mar 2001 12:18:48 +0000
• Re: Demonstration application
  From Dyke Stiles at Thu, 15 Mar 2001 22:02:07 +0000
• Re: Demonstration application
  From Joseph Bowbeer at Thu, 15 Mar 2001 20:41:56 +0000
• Re: Demonstration application
  From Roy Wilson at Thu, 15 Mar 2001 19:13:06 +0000
• Demonstration application
  From johan . sunter at Thu, 15 Mar 2001 12:44:36 +0000
• Commstime on embedded Java from Esmertec
  From oyvind . teig at Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:58:02 +0000
• CPA 2001 (WoTUG-24)
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:00:30 +0000
• CPA session at PDTPA'2001
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:33:25 +0000
• PDTPA 2001 etc
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:26:35 +0000
• Scheduling of two Java Applets
  From oyvind . teig at Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:40:34 +0000
• Re: Real-time Java?
  From Doug Lea at Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:54:48 +0000
• Re: Real-time Java?
  From oyvind . teig at Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:43:32 +0000
• Re: Folding editors
  From A E Lawrence at Mon, 5 Feb 2001 22:37:44 +0000
• Folding editors
  From jm40 at Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:53:58 +0000
• Re: a few questions
  From Doug Lea at Sat, 3 Feb 2001 00:50:45 +0000
• Re: Real-time Java?
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:38:01 +0000
• Re: Real-time Java?
  From Richard Beton at Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:46:13 +0000
• Real-time Java?
  From G. S. Stiles at Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:30:16 +0000
• RE: a few questions
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:32:25 +0000
• RE: a few questions
  From oyvind . teig at Fri, 2 Feb 2001 08:52:43 +0000
• Re: a few questions
  From Richard Beton at Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:47:06 +0000
• RE: a few questions
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:52:44 +0000
• RE: a few questions
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:37:05 +0000
• Re: a few questions
  From Roy Wilson at Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:45:42 +0000
• Re: a few questions
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:01:11 +0000
• a few questions
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:28:58 +0000
• Re: Experience with JCSP/CTJ/FDR
  From Dyke Stiles at Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:47:00 +0000
• RE: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:02:17 +0000
• RE: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From oyvind . teig at Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:55:11 +0000
• Re: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From Richard Beton at Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:49:05 +0000
• RE: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:02:16 +0000
• A book about concurrency and JCSP?
  From Roy Wilson at Sat, 27 Jan 2001 14:12:06 +0000
• Re: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From Alexander Anderson at Sat, 27 Jan 2001 13:36:20 +0000
• Experience with JCSP
  From Andrzej Lewandowski at Sat, 27 Jan 2001 02:02:27 +0000
• RE: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 26 Jan 2001 19:18:31 +0000
• CSP "encapsulated" in UML?
  From Roy Wilson at Fri, 26 Jan 2001 16:51:40 +0000
• RE: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Fri, 26 Jan 2001 11:27:37 +0000
• Re: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 25 Jan 2001 13:43:09 +0000
• RE: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From Andrzej Lewandowski at Thu, 25 Jan 2001 13:35:27 +0000
• Re: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From oyvind . teig at Thu, 25 Jan 2001 13:07:32 +0000
• Re: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 25 Jan 2001 12:13:04 +0000
• Re: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From Richard Beton at Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:50:47 +0000
• RE: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From Richard Miller at Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:11:36 +0000
• Re: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:46:34 +0000
• RE: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:22:37 +0000
• RE: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:48:28 +0000
• RE: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Tue, 23 Jan 2001 23:12:39 +0000
• Re: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From Roy Wilson at Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:53:37 +0000
• Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From oyvind . teig at Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:47:48 +0000
• Re: Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From Richard Beton at Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:23:45 +0000
• Java Live | January 9, 2001
  From Roy Wilson at Tue, 23 Jan 2001 16:24:54 +0000
• Re: Assistance requested on a Hoare-y problem
  From Roy Wilson at Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:28:01 +0000
• Re: Assistance requested on a Hoare-y problem - corrected and cleaned up...
  From G. S. Stiles at Mon, 8 Jan 2001 04:38:22 +0000
• Re: Assistance requested on a Hoare-y problem
  From G. S. Stiles at Sun, 7 Jan 2001 19:34:02 +0000
• Assistance requested on a Hoare-y problem
  From Roy Wilson at Sun, 7 Jan 2001 18:11:22 +0000
• Re: SV: Ripple: A Folding Editor
  From oyvind . teig at Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:43:50 +0000
• Re: SV: Ripple: A Folding Editor
  From Tom Locke at Wed, 20 Dec 2000 09:29:09 +0000
• SV: Ripple: A Folding Editor
  From Sture . Carlson at Wed, 20 Dec 2000 09:22:48 +0000
• Ripple: A Folding Editor
  From Tom Locke at Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:43:02 +0000
• RE: Mobile Processes (was 'Slides from my talk at CPA2000')
  From ianeast at Wed, 6 Dec 2000 13:32:03 +0000
• RE: Mobile Processes (was 'Slides from my talk at CPA2000')
  From Tom Locke at Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:15:51 +0000
• Re: (now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000
  From Richard Beton at Wed, 6 Dec 2000 10:53:38 +0000
• RE: (now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000
  From Campbell, John at Tue, 5 Dec 2000 18:00:21 +0000
• Re: (now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000
  From Stephen Maudsley at Tue, 5 Dec 2000 12:07:30 +0000
• RE: (now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000
  From gordon_hutchison at Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:19:43 +0000
• Re: (now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000
  From A E Lawrence at Fri, 1 Dec 2000 22:07:46 +0000
• RE: (now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000
  From Campbell, John at Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:58:42 +0000
• (now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000
  From Tom Locke at Fri, 1 Dec 2000 17:22:32 +0000
• Re: CommsTime times?
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 21 Nov 2000 12:29:38 +0000
• Re: CommsTime times?
  From Richard Beton at Tue, 21 Nov 2000 11:32:45 +0000
• RE: CommsTime times?
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:11:51 +0000
• RE: CommsTime times?
  From O'Neill, Brian at Fri, 17 Nov 2000 15:11:06 +0000
• RE: CommsTime times?
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 17 Nov 2000 14:20:13 +0000
• RE: CommsTime times?
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Fri, 17 Nov 2000 14:13:12 +0000
• Re: CommsTime times?
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 17 Nov 2000 12:55:56 +0000
• RE: ComsTime
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Fri, 17 Nov 2000 12:11:00 +0000
• Re: CommsTime times?
  From B.M. Cook at Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:13:32 +0000
• Re: CommsTime times?
  From Roger Peel at Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:37:02 +0000
• Re: CommsTime times?
  From B.M. Cook at Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:02:08 +0000
• Re: CommsTime times?
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 16 Nov 2000 19:05:29 +0000
• Re: CommsTime times?
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 16 Nov 2000 18:50:26 +0000
• CommsTime times?
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 14 Nov 2000 07:51:21 +0000
• ComsTime
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Mon, 13 Nov 2000 21:13:42 +0000
• Re: CommsTime times?
  From Oyvind Teig at Mon, 13 Nov 2000 13:33:05 +0000
• Re: CommsTime times?
  From D.C.Wood at Thu, 9 Nov 2000 16:19:46 +0000
• CommsTime times?
  From Dyke Stiles at Thu, 9 Nov 2000 01:24:47 +0000
• Re: FW: A "CJT" in python
  From Andrew Cooke at Mon, 6 Nov 2000 18:07:28 +0000
• RE: FW: A "CJT" in python
  From Lawrence Dickson at Mon, 30 Oct 2000 00:55:24 +0000
• RE: FW: A "CJT" in python
  From jm40 at Sun, 29 Oct 2000 18:33:03 +0000
• Re: FW: A "CJT" in python
  From Lawrence Dickson at Sun, 29 Oct 2000 14:40:24 +0000
• RE: A "CJT" in python
  From jm40 at Sun, 29 Oct 2000 12:27:54 +0000
• Re: A "CJT" in python
  From Lawrence Dickson at Sat, 28 Oct 2000 23:21:10 +0100
• Re: A "CJT" in python
  From Andrew Cooke at Sat, 28 Oct 2000 20:23:33 +0100
• RE: A "CJT" in python
  From jm40 at Sat, 28 Oct 2000 11:27:11 +0100
• A "CJT" in python
  From A E Lawrence at Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:02:55 +0100
• Re: Provably correct OS?
  From Lawrence Dickson at Thu, 26 Oct 2000 23:36:25 +0100
• Provably correct OS?
  From Dyke Stiles at Thu, 26 Oct 2000 22:52:30 +0100
• Re: commstime description???
  From Richard Beton at Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:06:28 +0100
• commstime description???
  From Dyke Stiles at Wed, 25 Oct 2000 00:09:21 +0100
• RE: Inheritance that can add/remove and new occam?
  From Lawrence Dickson at Tue, 24 Oct 2000 19:15:55 +0100
• RE: Inheritance that can add/remove and new occam?
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 24 Oct 2000 18:23:52 +0100
• RE: Inheritance that can add/remove and new occam?
  From Nayef Baker at Tue, 24 Oct 2000 18:10:23 +0100
• RE: OO and CSP (and real-time requirements)
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:57:29 +0100
• Re. Budgets, etc.
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:41:36 +0100
• RE: Inheritance that can add/remove and new occam?
  From O'Neill, Brian at Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:28:59 +0100
• CSP Patterns and Style for OO: The good the bad and the ugly?
  From gordon_hutchison at Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:09:11 +0100
• Re: Inheritance that can add/remove and new occam?
  From Nayef Baker at Mon, 23 Oct 2000 15:01:56 +0100
• Re: Inheritance that can add/remove and new occam?
  From M_Boosten at Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:59:03 +0100
• Inheritance that can add/remove and new occam?
  From Oyvind Teig at Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:14:00 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based
  From M_Boosten at Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:03:14 +0100
• Data Sharing Problem
  From M_Boosten at Mon, 23 Oct 2000 12:55:30 +0100
• Re: Aliasing and Garbage Collection
  From M_Boosten at Mon, 23 Oct 2000 12:27:21 +0100
• Re: Quixotic thought #57: Software salvation via JCSP
  From A E Lawrence at Sat, 21 Oct 2000 11:07:29 +0100
• RE: Quixotic thought #57: Software salvation via JCSP
  From Lawrence Dickson at Sat, 21 Oct 2000 00:14:40 +0100
• RE: Quixotic thought #57: Software salvation via JCSP
  From Campbell, John at Fri, 20 Oct 2000 23:23:48 +0100
• RE: OO and CSP (and real-time requirements)
  From Campbell, John at Fri, 20 Oct 2000 19:37:21 +0100
• Re: Aliasing and Garbage Collection
  From Richard Beton at Fri, 20 Oct 2000 16:33:08 +0100
• Quixotic thought #57: Software salvation via JCSP
  From Roy Wilson at Fri, 20 Oct 2000 16:30:39 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based
  From M_Boosten at Fri, 20 Oct 2000 15:29:22 +0100
• Re: Aliasing and Garbage Collection
  From Andrew Cooke at Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:52:18 +0100
• Re: Aliasing and Garbage Collection
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:16:29 +0100
• Re: Blackhole mailing list issues
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:56:31 +0100
• Re: Blackhole mailing list issues
  From Richard Beton at Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:38:22 +0100
• Re: Blackhole mailing list issues
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:58:07 +0100
• Re: Blackhole mailing list issues
  From M_Boosten at Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:36:32 +0100
• Re: Blackhole mailing list issues
  From M_Boosten at Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:28:59 +0100
• Re: Blackhole mailing list issues
  From A E Lawrence at Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:31:54 +0100
• Re: Blackhole mailing list issues
  From M_Boosten at Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:58:17 +0100
• Re: Blackhole mailing list issues
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:49:11 +0100
• Re: Aliasing and Garbage Collection
  From A E Lawrence at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 21:12:36 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based
  From Lawrence Dickson at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:14:51 +0100
• RE: Aliasing and Garbage Collection
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:40:24 +0100
• RE: Aliasing and Garbage Collection
  From Campbell, John at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:14:33 +0100
• Re: Blackhole mailing list issues
  From A E Lawrence at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:12:39 +0100
• Re: Blackhole mailing list issues
  From Tom Locke at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:38:15 +0100
• Re: Aliasing and Garbage Collection
  From Tom Locke at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:32:19 +0100
• Re: Aliasing and Garbage Collection
  From Tom Locke at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:32:17 +0100
• Re: Blackhole mailing list issues
  From Richard Beton at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:00:52 +0100
• Re: Aliasing and Garbage Collection
  From B.M. Cook at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 13:19:01 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based
  From M_Boosten at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 13:03:27 +0100
• Re: Transactions
  From M_Boosten at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:56:04 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Success.
  From M_Boosten at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:54:12 +0100
• Blackhole mailing list issues
  From M_Boosten at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:39:49 +0100
• Re: Aliasing and Garbage Collection
  From M_Boosten at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:25:30 +0100
• Re: Mailing list issues
  From B.M. Cook at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:22:05 +0100
• Observer Pattern
  From Tom Locke at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:52:40 +0100
• Re: Aliasing and Garbage Collection
  From Richard Beton at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:51:52 +0100
• Transactions
  From Tom Locke at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:37:07 +0100
• Mailing list issues
  From Tom Locke at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:01:04 +0100
• Aliasing and Garbage Collection
  From Tom Locke at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:54:40 +0100
• If I[he] were king: A proposal for fixing the Java programming language's threading problems
  From gordon_hutchison at Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:17:23 +0100
• Re: Hi (joining list)
  From A E Lawrence at Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:31:54 +0100
• Hi (joining list)
  From Test at Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:41:44 +0100
• Protocol design, Handel-C and Hierarchical State Machines
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 10 Oct 2000 08:12:57 +0100
• Re: Does the KISS principle apply?
  From Roy Wilson at Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:54:29 +0100
• Does the KISS principle apply?
  From Roy Wilson at Mon, 9 Oct 2000 11:32:15 +0100
• Re: For the love of CSP ...
  From Lawrence Dickson at Mon, 9 Oct 2000 03:35:10 +0100
• For the love of CSP ...
  From Roy Wilson at Mon, 9 Oct 2000 02:17:18 +0100
• Re: CSP-OZ Backtracking.
  From A E Lawrence at Sun, 8 Oct 2000 17:27:12 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based
  From A E Lawrence at Sun, 8 Oct 2000 17:05:34 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based
  From Andrew Cooke at Fri, 6 Oct 2000 17:47:53 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based
  From Richard Beton at Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:33:15 +0100
• RE: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Succes s.
  From M_Boosten at Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:06:19 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based
  From Andrew Cooke at Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:05:34 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Success.
  From M_Boosten at Fri, 6 Oct 2000 14:11:56 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Succes s.
  From B.M. Cook at Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:54:33 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based
  From B.M. Cook at Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:52:27 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Success.
  From Stephen Maudsley at Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:42:18 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Success.
  From IanPage99 at Fri, 6 Oct 2000 00:51:42 +0100
• RE: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Succes s.
  From Lawrence Dickson at Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:49:12 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Success.
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:34:14 +0100
• RE: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Succes s.
  From O'Neill, Brian at Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:20:48 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Success.
  From Lawrence Dickson at Thu, 5 Oct 2000 17:40:29 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Success.
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 5 Oct 2000 17:16:35 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Success.
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:50:31 +0100
• Rewriting CSP processes.... CERN expertice on Metastability
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:03:17 +0100
• RE: rewriting CSP processes
  From Tony at Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:52:59 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Success.
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:39:44 +0100
• Re: A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Success.
  From B.M. Cook at Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:33:39 +0100
• A path for CSP-based Solutions towards HUGE Industrial Success.
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 5 Oct 2000 09:53:01 +0100
• Re: CSP, usability, profit, Java, etc.
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 5 Oct 2000 09:21:48 +0100
• RE: CSP-OZ Backtracking.
  From Campbell, John at Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:56:09 +0100
• RE: CSP-OZ Backtracking.
  From Campbell, John at Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:42:34 +0100
• Re: rewriting CSP processes
  From B.M. Cook at Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:45:23 +0100
• Re: SPOC for PIC
  From Denis A Nicole at Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:41:54 +0100
• RE: CSP-OZ Backtracking.
  From lsfreitas at Sat, 30 Sep 2000 01:00:31 +0100
• RE: CSP-OZ Backtracking.
  From Campbell, John at Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:30:58 +0100
• Re: Making CSP into a success
  From Richard Beton at Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:59:13 +0100
• Re: Making CSP into a success
  From Lawrence Dickson at Fri, 29 Sep 2000 17:59:01 +0100
• CSP, usability, profit, Java, etc.
  From Roy Wilson at Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:53:58 +0100
• Re: Making CSP into a success
  From M_Boosten at Fri, 29 Sep 2000 15:19:12 +0100
• Re: Making CSP into a success
  From M_Boosten at Fri, 29 Sep 2000 14:40:40 +0100
• Re: rewriting CSP processes
  From Stephen Maudsley at Fri, 29 Sep 2000 14:21:41 +0100
• Re: rewriting CSP processes
  From Stephen Maudsley at Fri, 29 Sep 2000 12:05:27 +0100
• Re: rewriting CSP processes
  From B.M. Cook at Fri, 29 Sep 2000 11:47:21 +0100
• Re: Making CSP into a success
  From Stephen Maudsley at Fri, 29 Sep 2000 11:05:30 +0100
• Making CSP into a success
  From Oyvind Teig at Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:31:33 +0100
• Making CSP into a success
  From M_Boosten at Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:08:20 +0100
• RE: Unclocked logic / delay insensitive circuits
  From Campbell, John at Thu, 28 Sep 2000 18:12:28 +0100
• Re: rewriting CSP processes
  From Lawrence Dickson at Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:07:26 +0100
• Re: Unclocked logic / delay insensitive circuits
  From B.M. Cook at Thu, 28 Sep 2000 12:53:11 +0100
• Re: rewriting CSP processes
  From B.M. Cook at Thu, 28 Sep 2000 12:52:05 +0100
• Re: Unclocked logic / delay insensitive circuits
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 28 Sep 2000 12:04:43 +0100
• Re: Unclocked logic / delay insensitive circuits
  From B.M. Cook at Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:54:17 +0100
• Re: rewriting CSP processes
  From B.M. Cook at Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:46:29 +0100
• Re: Unclocked logic / delay insensitive circuits
  From B.M. Cook at Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:28:34 +0100
• Re: Unclocked logic / delay insensitive circuits
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:22:25 +0100
• Unclocked logic / delay insensitive circuits
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 28 Sep 2000 08:22:24 +0100
• RE: rewriting CSP processes
  From Campbell, John at Wed, 27 Sep 2000 18:10:02 +0100
• Re: rewriting CSP processes
  From Michael Goldsmith at Wed, 27 Sep 2000 17:25:23 +0100
• RE: rewriting CSP processes
  From Campbell, John at Wed, 27 Sep 2000 17:09:33 +0100
• Re: rewriting CSP processes
  From B.M. Cook at Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:38:53 +0100
• Re: Database transactions, a Higher-level primitive in CSP?
  From M_Boosten at Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:35:19 +0100
• rewriting CSP processes
  From Campbell, John at Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:23:51 +0100
• Re: Synchronous Communication = Swap
  From A E Lawrence at Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:09:45 +0100
• Re: Database transactions, a Higher-level primitive in CSP?
  From Richard Beton at Wed, 27 Sep 2000 10:49:05 +0100
• Re: Synchronous Communication = Swap
  From M_Boosten at Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:59:56 +0100
• Re: Database transactions, a Higher-level primitive in CSP?
  From M_Boosten at Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:31:28 +0100
• Re: Synchronous Communication = Swap
  From M_Boosten at Wed, 27 Sep 2000 08:45:36 +0100
• Database transactions, a Higher-level primitive in CSP?
  From Oyvind Teig at Wed, 27 Sep 2000 07:39:51 +0100
• Database transactions, a Higher-level primitive in CSP?
  From M_Boosten at Wed, 27 Sep 2000 07:11:25 +0100
• Re: Synchronous Communication = Swap
  From Lawrence Dickson at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 18:10:04 +0100
• Re: Synchronous Communication = Swap
  From A E Lawrence at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 16:20:51 +0100
• Re: Synchronous Communication = Swap
  From M_Boosten at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 16:08:08 +0100
• Re: Synchronous Communication = Swap
  From Richard Beton at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 15:24:55 +0100
• Re: Synchronous Communication = Swap
  From A E Lawrence at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 15:06:25 +0100
• Re: CSP and LL-CSP
  From A E Lawrence at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:46:20 +0100
• Re: Synchronous Communication = Swap
  From M_Boosten at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:29:55 +0100
• CSP and LL-CSP
  From M_Boosten at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:27:52 +0100
• Re: Synchronous Communication = Swap
  From A E Lawrence at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 13:47:24 +0100
• Re: Synchronous Communication = Swap
  From Richard Beton at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 11:22:18 +0100
• Re: unsubscribe
  From Richard Beton at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 11:10:56 +0100
• Re: Synchronous Communication = Swap
  From Stephen Maudsley at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 10:42:23 +0100
• unsubscribe
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 10:21:19 +0100
• Synchronous Communication = Swap
  From M_Boosten at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 08:25:42 +0100
• Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 26 Sep 2000 07:48:03 +0100
• TCPP and IPDPS
  From Nan C Schaller at Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:51:55 +0100
• Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From Lawrence Dickson at Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:06:11 +0100
• Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From Oyvind Teig at Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:49:17 +0100
• Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From B.M. Cook at Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:34:32 +0100
• Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From johan . sunter at Mon, 25 Sep 2000 08:32:57 +0100
• Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From Oyvind Teig at Mon, 25 Sep 2000 07:26:59 +0100
• Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From Ruth Ivimey-Cook at Sun, 24 Sep 2000 00:00:07 +0100
• Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From Lawrence Dickson at Sat, 23 Sep 2000 03:06:31 +0100
• Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 22 Sep 2000 18:16:15 +0100
• Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 22 Sep 2000 13:57:38 +0100
• Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From Lawrence Dickson at Fri, 22 Sep 2000 13:48:43 +0100
• Pipework: plumbing instead of programming.
  From Oyvind Teig at Fri, 22 Sep 2000 13:48:11 +0100
• Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 22 Sep 2000 13:30:18 +0100
• Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From M_Boosten at Fri, 22 Sep 2000 12:35:30 +0100
• "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
  From Oyvind Teig at Fri, 22 Sep 2000 09:31:33 +0100
• Basic threads!?
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 21 Sep 2000 11:00:21 +0100
• NEW CTJ 0.9 rev. 17
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Mon, 18 Sep 2000 22:27:15 +0100
• Re: Thread libraries and Deadlock - jGuru.com
  From A E Lawrence at Fri, 15 Sep 2000 21:00:35 +0100
• Thread libraries and Deadlock - jGuru.com
  From Richard Beton at Fri, 15 Sep 2000 10:16:13 +0100
• A doubt about multiple waits
  From Leonardo Freitas at Tue, 22 Aug 2000 13:13:57 +0100
• Java Timer
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 22 Aug 2000 07:34:18 +0100
• Re: ALTs on inputs and outputs
  From A E Lawrence at Sat, 19 Aug 2000 13:08:52 +0100
• New JCSP release
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 17 Aug 2000 22:07:11 +0100
• CPA-2000 papers & timetable
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 15 Aug 2000 21:36:08 +0100
• Re: ALTs on inputs and outputs
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 15 Aug 2000 17:34:05 +0100
• RE: ALTs on inputs and outputs
  From Gerald Hilderink at Tue, 15 Aug 2000 17:21:27 +0100
• Re: ALTs on inputs and outputs
  From B.M. Cook at Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:25:27 +0100
• ALTs on inputs and outputs
  From Campbell, John at Tue, 15 Aug 2000 14:54:21 +0100
• Communicating Process Architectures 2000
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 2 Aug 2000 18:57:21 +0100
• Re: sJava
  From Roy Wilson at Mon, 31 Jul 2000 11:20:57 +0100
• sJava
  From Oyvind Teig at Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:26:04 +0100
• Re: Formal Java?
  From Roy Wilson at Sat, 24 Jun 2000 00:50:37 +0100
• Re: Formal Java?
  From A E Lawrence at Fri, 23 Jun 2000 23:11:15 +0100
• Formal Java?
  From Dyke Stiles at Fri, 23 Jun 2000 22:37:24 +0100
• Safer multitasking with CSP
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 20 Jun 2000 15:01:29 +0100
• Re: Safer multitasking with CSP
  From B.M. Cook at Thu, 15 Jun 2000 17:17:50 +0100
• KRoC version 1.2.3 for Linux released
  From Frederick Barnes at Wed, 14 Jun 2000 17:09:53 +0100
• Safer multitasking with CSP
  From Oyvind Teig at Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:42:19 +0100
• Final Call for Papers : CPA-2000
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 7 Jun 2000 10:01:09 +0100
• Final Call For Participation: Las Vegas, June 26-29, PDPTA + etc.
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:58:38 +0100
• Re: Problems compiling jcsp examples and demos with Java 2 JDK 1.3
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 6 Jun 2000 13:10:30 +0100
• [Fwd: Insecure parallelism with Java?]
  From Roy Wilson at Thu, 25 May 2000 19:28:26 +0100
• Re: [Fwd: Insecure parallelism with Java?]
  From B.M. Cook at Thu, 25 May 2000 09:35:36 +0100
• [Fwd: Insecure parallelism with Java?]
  From Roy Wilson at Thu, 25 May 2000 01:29:00 +0100
• RE: Data sharing in java
  From Gerald Hilderink at Wed, 10 May 2000 00:58:01 +0100
• Re: Data sharing in java
  From Richard Beton at Tue, 9 May 2000 18:01:42 +0100
• Data sharing in java
  From Jeremy Martin at Tue, 9 May 2000 16:56:43 +0100
• New KRoC/Linux release (1.2.2)
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 5 May 2000 12:01:00 +0100
• Re: ALTing select mechanism implementation
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 4 May 2000 14:12:26 +0100
• Re: ALTing select mechanism implementation
  From Stephen Maudsley at Thu, 4 May 2000 11:48:28 +0100
• A floating world
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 4 May 2000 10:58:27 +0100
• A floating world
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 4 May 2000 09:49:17 +0100
• Re: A floating world
  From D.C.Wood at Thu, 4 May 2000 09:48:13 +0100
• A floating world
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 4 May 2000 09:05:55 +0100
• Re: CriticalSection in VisaulC++ in C
  From johan . sunter at Tue, 2 May 2000 10:55:00 +0100
• Re: CriticalSection in VisaulC++ in C
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 2 May 2000 10:22:42 +0100
• CriticalSection in VisaulC++ in C
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 27 Apr 2000 08:43:29 +0100
• Re: The dangers of priority inheritance
  From Richard Beton at Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:47:35 +0100
• The dangers of priority inheritance
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:38:07 +0100
• Priority inversion and CSP channels?
  From Oyvind Teig at Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:40:14 +0100
• CFP: Reliable Distributed Systems
  From G. S. Stiles at Sun, 26 Mar 2000 00:29:37 +0000
• CSP & Object orientation
  From johan . sunter at Fri, 24 Mar 2000 15:07:08 +0000
• Communicating Process Architectures - 2000 (WoTUG-23)
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:37:06 +0000
• Doug Lea's concurrency classes
  From Richard Beton at Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:13:49 +0000
• Apache JServ : Class Lock
  From Richard Beton at Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:16:11 +0000
• Apache Jserv: Lock and Semaphore
  From Richard Beton at Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:15:57 +0000
• UML Point/Counterpoint: Mellor vs. Selic
  From Oyvind Teig at Mon, 13 Mar 2000 08:01:03 +0000
• Re: Next WoTUG conference (the 23rd.)
  From Ruth Ivimey-Cook at Sun, 5 Mar 2000 23:03:13 +0000
• Re: x2AnyChannels do not allow alting
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 3 Mar 2000 12:19:01 +0000
• Re: x2AnyChannels do not allow alting
  From Michael Goldsmith at Fri, 3 Mar 2000 11:50:09 +0000
• Re: x2AnyChannels do not allow alting
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 3 Mar 2000 09:47:21 +0000
• Re: x2AnyChannels do not allow alting
  From B.M. Cook at Fri, 3 Mar 2000 09:18:16 +0000
• RE: Loosing abstraction due to non-alting channels
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 2 Mar 2000 18:23:59 +0000
• RE: x2AnyChannels do not allow alting
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 2 Mar 2000 17:03:26 +0000
• Next WoTUG conference (the 23rd.)
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 2 Mar 2000 16:48:43 +0000
• Re: Loosing abstraction due to non-alting channels
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 2 Mar 2000 13:00:04 +0000
• Re: Loosing abstraction due to non-alting channels
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 2 Mar 2000 11:56:02 +0000
• RE: Loosing abstraction due to non-alting channels
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:57:37 +0000
• Re: Losing abstraction
  From Richard Beton at Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:28:41 +0000
• RE: x2AnyChannels do not allow alting
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:00:28 +0000
• Losing abstraction
  From Roy Wilson at Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:21:28 +0000
• Loosing abstraction due to non-alting channels
  From M_Boosten at Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:39:21 +0000
• RE: x2AnyChannels do not allow alting
  From M_Boosten at Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:16:58 +0000
• RE: x2AnyChannels do not allow alting
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 17 Feb 2000 20:03:05 +0000
• RE: x2AnyChannels do not allow alting
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Thu, 17 Feb 2000 16:18:31 +0000
• x2AnyChannels do not allow alting
  From M_Boosten at Thu, 17 Feb 2000 13:07:04 +0000
• Priority Inversion in Monitors.
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 3 Feb 2000 08:34:46 +0000
• Priority Inversion in Monitors.
  From gordon_hutchison at Wed, 2 Feb 2000 16:37:03 +0000
• Re: Priority inversion and CSP channels?
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 2 Feb 2000 12:46:34 +0000
• Priority inversion and CSP channels?
  From Gerald H. Hilderink at Wed, 2 Feb 2000 12:06:47 +0000
• Book announcement
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:44:37 +0000
• Raw keyboard input for Java (?)
  From B.M. Cook at Mon, 10 Jan 2000 09:24:52 +0000
• WoTUG-23 Final CFP
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:54:14 +0000
• Real Time Spec for Java (Sun)
  From Oyvind Teig at Mon, 6 Dec 1999 11:45:33 +0000
• Computer Weekly - 25th Nov 99
  From Richard Beton at Thu, 25 Nov 1999 17:22:22 +0000
• Java for Embedded Systems Show, Olympia, London, UK (May 24-25)
  From Oyvind Teig at Mon, 15 Nov 1999 08:15:11 +0000
• Error admitted: another notifyAll() too little
  From Oyvind Teig at Mon, 15 Nov 1999 08:08:44 +0000
• A JCSP et al publication route...
  From Paddy Nixon at Mon, 1 Nov 1999 11:29:35 +0000
• Re: JCSP 0.94 release
  From Richard Beton at Fri, 22 Oct 1999 09:06:09 +0100
• PDPTA'2000 etc.
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 15 Oct 1999 15:41:56 +0100
• JCSP 0.94 release
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 14 Oct 1999 17:49:03 +0100
• IDL as common interface
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 26 Aug 1999 13:58:22 +0100
• IDL as common interface
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 26 Aug 1999 12:12:30 +0100
• [Fwd: MAJC chip from SUN]
  From G. S. Stiles at Thu, 26 Aug 1999 06:23:38 +0100
• Web archive
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:07:38 +0100
• Priority Ceiling Protocol totally eliminates deadlock
  From Oyvind Teig at Mon, 16 Aug 1999 09:13:48 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From Bryan Scattergood at Tue, 10 Aug 1999 16:11:10 +0100
• Re: Disable interrupts in critical sections?
  From B.M. Cook at Tue, 10 Aug 1999 15:27:05 +0100
• Disable interrupts in critical sections?
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 10 Aug 1999 14:58:03 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From Jeremy Martin at Tue, 10 Aug 1999 12:37:20 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 10 Aug 1999 12:33:12 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From Bryan Scattergood at Tue, 10 Aug 1999 12:12:21 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 10 Aug 1999 07:53:00 +0100
• Finishing off the proof of JCSP
  From Jeremy Martin at Sun, 8 Aug 1999 20:38:53 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 6 Aug 1999 23:25:05 +0100
• Re: Something for the weekend ...
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 6 Aug 1999 17:48:32 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From Jeremy Martin at Thu, 5 Aug 1999 13:43:26 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From Jeremy Martin at Thu, 5 Aug 1999 11:55:13 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 4 Aug 1999 20:02:18 +0100
• A CSP model for Java threads - a subtle point
  From Jeremy Martin at Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:42:57 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From Jeremy Martin at Fri, 30 Jul 1999 15:47:15 +0100
• RE: Channels versus Methods
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 9 Jul 1999 18:48:28 +0100
• RE: Channels versus Methods
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 9 Jul 1999 18:39:52 +0100
• RE: Channels versus Methods
  From Gerald Hilderink at Fri, 9 Jul 1999 10:32:43 +0100
• RE: Channels versus Methods
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 8 Jul 1999 19:10:42 +0100
• RE: Channels versus Methods
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 8 Jul 1999 18:53:41 +0100
• other CALL channel
  From Gerald Hilderink at Thu, 8 Jul 1999 15:11:41 +0100
• Re: Channels versus Methods
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 2 Jul 1999 14:43:27 +0100
• RE: Channels versus Methods
  From Umland, Thomas at Fri, 2 Jul 1999 13:29:42 +0100
• Re: Channels versus Methods
  From Thomas Umland at Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:16:10 +0100
• RE: Channels versus Methods
  From Gerald Hilderink at Thu, 1 Jul 1999 15:41:18 +0100
• Re: Channels versus Methods
  From Richard Beton at Thu, 1 Jul 1999 10:15:58 +0100
• Re: Channels versus Methods
  From Thomas Umland at Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:24:32 +0100
• CALL Channels in Java
  From Hilderink, G.H. at Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:30:11 +0100
• Colorado Software Summit
  From Adrian Lawrence at Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:08:17 +0100
• RE: Channels versus Methods
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:23:14 +0100
• RE: Channels versus Methods
  From Umland, Thomas at Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:00:35 +0100
• AN APPEAL TO COMMON SENSE
  From Per Brinch Hansen at Sun, 27 Jun 1999 02:06:06 +0100
• Channels versus Methods
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:59:08 +0100
• Re:FYI- JProbe Threadalyzer
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 24 Jun 1999 07:28:20 +0100
• Re:FYI- JProbe Threadalyzer
  From P.H.Welch at Wed, 23 Jun 1999 15:21:37 +0100
• Re:FYI- JProbe Threadalyzer
  From Oyvind Teig at Wed, 23 Jun 1999 12:52:24 +0100
• FYI- JProbe Threadalyzer
  From Richard Beton at Mon, 21 Jun 1999 12:25:55 +0100
• Re: Javaworld article on threads no. 9
  From J.Moores at Wed, 16 Jun 1999 11:46:40 +0100
• Re: Javaworld article on threads no. 9
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:05:45 +0100
• Javaworld article on threads no. 9
  From J.Moores at Tue, 15 Jun 1999 16:24:18 +0100
• Re: OCCAM, JOYCE, SUPERPASCAL AND JAVA
  From Denis A Nicole at Wed, 9 Jun 1999 11:20:50 +0100
• Re: OCCAM, JOYCE, SUPERPASCAL AND JAVA
  From Oyvind Teig at Wed, 9 Jun 1999 06:51:12 +0100
• Re: OCCAM, JOYCE, SUPERPASCAL AND JAVA
  From P.H.Welch at Tue, 8 Jun 1999 18:51:13 +0100
• Folding editor
  From Oyvind Teig at Fri, 28 May 1999 08:16:59 +0100
• Re: OCCAM, JOYCE, SUPERPASCAL AND JAVA
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 24 May 1999 20:16:48 +0100
• Re: You must read this (20 May 99)
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 24 May 1999 20:01:17 +0100
• Re: You must read this
  From Christopher C R Jones at Mon, 24 May 1999 16:54:42 +0100
• PARALLEL RECURSION
  From Per Brinch Hansen at Mon, 24 May 1999 03:07:08 +0100
• OCCAM, JOYCE, SUPERPASCAL AND JAVA
  From Per Brinch Hansen at Sun, 23 May 1999 00:02:36 +0100
• Re: You must read this: Brinch Hansen Java book
  From G. S. Stiles at Sat, 22 May 1999 04:27:27 +0100
• Re: You must read this
  From Jon Kerridge at Fri, 21 May 1999 11:55:16 +0100
• Re: You must read this
  From Oyvind Teig at Fri, 21 May 1999 06:59:18 +0100
• Re: You must read this
  From Richard Beton at Thu, 20 May 1999 18:03:15 +0100
• Re: You must read this
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 20 May 1999 17:29:38 +0100
• Re: You must read this
  From Richard Beton at Tue, 18 May 1999 16:29:10 +0100
• You must read this
  From B.M. Cook at Tue, 18 May 1999 15:57:28 +0100
• Checking (Was: Re: New Book: CONCURRENCY)
  From Ruth Ivimey-Cook at Sun, 25 Apr 1999 18:31:47 +0100
• Re: New Book: CONCURRENCY
  From Jeremy Martin at Thu, 22 Apr 1999 10:01:00 +0100
• Re: New Book: CONCURRENCY
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 22 Apr 1999 07:45:20 +0100
• Re: New Book: CONCURRENCY
  From Denis A Nicole at Wed, 21 Apr 1999 15:56:00 +0100
• Re: New Book: CONCURRENCY
  From Bryan Scattergood at Wed, 21 Apr 1999 12:47:33 +0100
• Re: New Book: CONCURRENCY
  From Oyvind Teig at Wed, 21 Apr 1999 11:25:35 +0100
• Re: New Book: CONCURRENCY
  From Denis A Nicole at Wed, 21 Apr 1999 10:43:31 +0100
• Concurrent Programming Using Java
  From A E Lawrence at Tue, 20 Apr 1999 23:29:09 +0100
• Re: New Book: CONCURRENCY
  From p0072370 at Tue, 20 Apr 1999 13:38:44 +0100
• Re: New Book: CONCURRENCY
  From Rick Beton at Tue, 20 Apr 1999 10:02:11 +0100
• Re: New Book: CONCURRENCY
  From Oyvind Teig at Tue, 20 Apr 1999 06:58:49 +0100
• Re: New Book: CONCURRENCY
  From Ian East at Mon, 19 Apr 1999 15:20:43 +0100
• Re: New Book: CONCURRENCY
  From P.H.Welch at Mon, 19 Apr 1999 13:05:39 +0100
• New Book: CONCURRENCY
  From Oyvind Teig at Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:36:49 +0100
• Formal Techniques for Java
  From Adrian Lawrence at Fri, 16 Apr 1999 23:22:21 +0100
• Re: Programming Java threads in the real world, Part 7 - JavaWorld
  From Rick Beton at Fri, 9 Apr 1999 10:29:20 +0100
• Re:Programming Java threads in the real world, Part 7 - JavaWorld
  From Oyvind Teig at Fri, 9 Apr 1999 10:16:44 +0100
• Re:Programming Java threads in the real world, Part 7 - JavaWorld
  From Oyvind Teig at Fri, 9 Apr 1999 08:41:34 +0100
• Programming Java threads in the real world, Part 7 - JavaWorld - April 1999
  From Rick Beton at Thu, 1 Apr 1999 14:21:05 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From P . H . Welch at Tue, 30 Mar 1999 12:15:32 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From P . H . Welch at Mon, 29 Mar 1999 17:40:20 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From P . H . Welch at Mon, 29 Mar 1999 17:18:10 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From Jeremy Martin at Mon, 29 Mar 1999 17:02:10 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From Jeremy Martin at Mon, 29 Mar 1999 15:17:51 +0100
• Re: A CSP model for Java threads
  From Rick Beton at Fri, 26 Mar 1999 17:48:07 GMT
• A CSP model for Java threads
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 26 Mar 1999 17:33:19 GMT
• Re: Something for the next few weekends
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:43:09 GMT
• Something for the next few weekends
  From Rick Beton at Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:08:24 GMT
• Re: FW: It was a stressing weekend!
  From Rick van Rein at Thu, 25 Mar 1999 14:22:25 GMT
• FW: It was a stressing weekend!
  From Gerald Hilderink at Thu, 25 Mar 1999 13:15:25 GMT
• Re: It was a stressing weekend!
  From Rick van Rein at Thu, 25 Mar 1999 12:33:08 GMT
• Great and usefule...
  From Gerald Hilderink at Thu, 25 Mar 1999 11:14:13 GMT
• RE: It was a stressing weekend!
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 25 Mar 1999 10:09:59 GMT
• RE: It was a stressing weekend!
  From Gerald Hilderink at Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:41:32 GMT
• Re:It was a stressing weekend!
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 25 Mar 1999 07:36:52 GMT
• It was a stressing weekend!
  From Gerald Hilderink at Wed, 24 Mar 1999 22:52:18 GMT
• Something for the weekend ...
  From P . H . Welch at Fri, 19 Mar 1999 18:24:55 GMT
• Re: "Fix" the semantics of synchronized
  From P.H.Welch at Thu, 25 Feb 1999 12:51:10 GMT
• "Fix" the semantics of synchronized
  From Oyvind Teig at Thu, 25 Feb 1999 10:17:28 GMT
• The Volano Report: Which Java platform is fastest, most scalable? A JavaWorld exclusive! - JavaWorld - March 1999
  From Rick Beton at Wed, 24 Feb 1999 09:04:54 GMT
• KRoC (occam) for Linux released ...
  From P . H . Welch at Mon, 22 Feb 1999 17:01:12 GMT
• Solid CSP and Peter's Chef
  From Oyvind Teig at Wed, 17 Feb 1999 07:55:18 GMT
• Re: Java Tip 68: Learn how to implement the Command pattern in Java - JavaWorld - February 1999
  From P.H.Welch at Fri, 12 Feb 1999 16:48:32 GMT
• Re: Java Tip 68: Learn how to implement the Command pattern in Java - JavaWorld - February 1999
  From P . H . Welch at Fri, 12 Feb 1999 16:18:00 GMT
• Re: Java Tip 68: Learn how to implement the Command pattern in
  From P . H . Welch at Fri, 12 Feb 1999 15:49:12 GMT
• Re: Java Tip 68: Learn how to implement the Command pattern in Java - JavaWorld - February 1999
  From Rick Beton at Fri, 12 Feb 1999 14:53:00 GMT
• Re: Java Tip 68: Learn how to implement the Command pattern in Java - JavaWorld - February 1999
  From Rick van Rein at Fri, 12 Feb 1999 14:52:12 GMT
• Re: Java Tip 68: Learn how to implement the Command pattern in
  From Oyvind Teig at Fri, 12 Feb 1999 14:25:53 GMT
• Re: Java Tip 68: Learn how to implement the Command pattern in Java - JavaWorld - February 1999
  From P . H . Welch at Fri, 12 Feb 1999 13:30:03 GMT
• Re: Java Tip 68: Learn how to implement the Command pattern in Java - JavaWorld - February 1999
  From J.Moores at Fri, 12 Feb 1999 12:59:22 GMT
• Re: Java Tip 68: Learn how to implement the Command pattern in Java - JavaWorld - February 1999
  From Rick Beton at Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:25:47 GMT
• Re: Java Tip 68: Learn how to implement the Command pattern in Java - JavaWorld - February 1999
  From P . H . Welch at Thu, 11 Feb 1999 18:54:51 GMT
• Java Tip 68: Learn how to implement the Command pattern in Java - JavaWorld - February 1999
  From Rick Beton at Wed, 10 Feb 1999 09:33:22 GMT
• Java (and ML)
  From Adrian Lawrence at Wed, 27 Jan 1999 20:50:07 GMT
• Re: ML for Java ? (fwd)
  From Rick van Rein at Mon, 25 Jan 1999 23:14:03 GMT
• ML for Java ? (fwd)
  From Adrian Lawrence at Mon, 25 Jan 1999 19:58:50 GMT
• Re[2]: Too good to be true: Re: Asynchronous Exceptions in Java ...
  From P . H . Welch at Fri, 4 Dec 1998 10:59:22 GMT
• Re[2]: Too good to be true: Re: Asynchronous Exceptions in J
  From james_wolffe at Thu, 3 Dec 1998 17:28:48 GMT
• Re: Too good to be true: Re: Asynchronous Exceptions in Java
  From Ian Page at Thu, 3 Dec 1998 15:22:06 GMT
• Re: Higher-level Real-time (was Re: An Invitation to the Real-Time Java Commu
  From P . H . Welch at Tue, 1 Dec 1998 20:13:19 GMT
• Higher level real-time (was: An Invitation to the Real-Time Java Community)</