[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?

To: java-threads@xxxxxxxxxx, occam-com@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
From: "Joe Bowbeer" <joe.bowbeer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:21:14 -0700
Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 03:26:16 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pQLfkBlPGTCViMsOekn8fa7pinejndWrNXY9E7zpqNpYxtLb8r1aw6Wihij3bsjsQrmkAoW4egRwkWHbxcmOomRyfSZ663O6msTv3tz4uNjud+jtufnxAGsY2nXmb+4CklLVw9QEOxjBgtKq/qQZAADxq7XTIg13TudH5zJWiLM=
Envelope-to: ats1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1151260982.449ed936456d2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <007a01c69719$796c38f0$467ba8c0@D2C7JZ1J> <1151260982.449ed936456d2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-java-threads@xxxxxxxxxx

On 6/25/06, Allan McInnes <amcinnes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Quoting Eric Verhulst <eric.verhulst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Has anyone been looking at Oz ?
>


Thanks for the pointer to Oz.

I really enjoyed these slides:

http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/~pvr/ircamTalk2006.pdf

Mutable state and OO aren't mentioned at all until the very end, and
then are only mentioned in passing (because mutable state is only
needed for modularity and none of the examples were big enough to need
it).

--
Joe Bowbeer ~ joebowbeer.thruhere.net

References:
- RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  - From: Allan McInnes

Prev by Date: Re: Intel: timely article
Next by Date: MS DSL designers
Previous by thread: RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
Next by thread: The world needs process-orientation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread