[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?

To: "tjoccam@xxxxxxxxxxx" <tjoccam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
From: "Joe Bowbeer" <joe.bowbeer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:06:16 -0700
Cc: "Ruth Ivimey-Cook" <Ruth.Ivimey-Cook@xxxxxxxxxx>, F.R.M.Barnes <f.r.m.barnes@xxxxxxxxxx>, java-threads@xxxxxxxxxx, occam-com@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:10:36 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EvP7Si9TqU2KUZB0BRpJ+6NtIuhF4zXwAInvVj6j5HUtBMC57rY7w3fpj+8VB6ZE2U0ttrvi0pb4SNCP/wV/5YiLY3KvLpYgoBDbt/qmxVRtN9wtveNfucVqCGb0Jw55mkzGp0AeEZu7ZJbiYahzmSIlcofaSg3eMoFQUAVRT/8=
Envelope-to: ats1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <2920.66.93.33.5.1151346419.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <32883.66.93.33.5.1151279409.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx> <000901c6993f$6efa88e0$0e00a8c0@sherlock> <2920.66.93.33.5.1151346419.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-java-threads@xxxxxxxxxx

On 6/26/06, tjoccam@xxxxxxxxxxx <tjoccam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Nobody with a bank account smaller than Microsoft's can support this kind
of interfacing. I contend, very strongly, that a path back to HOSTIO and
STREAMIO would be worth literally billions of dollars, not to mention the
sanity of thousands of programmers who are now burning out.

What do the rest of you think?


Is it time to unhitch Java-Threads from this discussion?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  - From: Mario Schweigler

References:
- RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  - From: tjoccam
- RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  - From: tjoccam

Prev by Date: RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
Next by Date: Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
Previous by thread: RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
Next by thread: Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread