Eric Verhulst (OLS) wrote:
This made me think: a long time ago, far far away... .no well anyway a long time ago someone suggested that the real thing that should have a priority attached to it was the communication itself: a message. Not the channel, or the task. The issue in ming, IIRC, was priority inversion. It has always struck me that this was a good model to go with, though I don't recall ever seeing it done or even investigated.
-- Software Manager & Engineer Tel: 01223 414180 Blog: http://www.ivimey.org/blog LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/ruthivimeycook/