RE: CSP-OZ Backtracking.

["Campbell, John" <John.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi All
My email program obscured what I was saying and what he said.
Sorry.  Try again....

> Hi
> 
	>	The point is in the implementation (Java) version of the
	>specification, we will
	>	need this kind of behaviour. 

> My point was that even though CSP doesn't specifically include
> back-tracking as part of its model, you can get that effect with
> suitably contrived inter process events.  Getting it right, without
> some sort of transformation tool might be tedious, but should be
> possible.  You're going to have to determine exactly what sequences of
> events comprise a backtrack, and program it that way. 
> 
	>This is the point but I am not tring to find or derive some new
theory... 

> I suspect that if you articulate what you mean by backtracking,
> a set of tranformation rules will become apparent.  Such
> transformation rules would guide you to the right set of "contrived"
> events that implement your back tracking in CSP.  Thats all I
> meant by a new CSP theory. -jc
> 
>