[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CSP and Actor Comparison
On 11/05/2010, at 12:31 PM, Sarah Mount wrote:
the link to http://vl.fmnet.info/csp/ labelled "The CSP Archive" (at
the bottom of the page) is broken and should probably be removed.
The same content now seems to be at http://formalmethods.wikia.com/
wiki/CSP . I've fixed the link.
I notice that, in general, there's a bit about CSP the calculus, but
little if anything about CSP the programming style or common idioms
that might attract practitioners.
Yes, the article is pretty tightly focused on CSP the process
algebra. That's probably partly because that's what you'll find if
you pick up a textbook on CSP, but also because Wikipedia favours
articles on well-delineated topics and prefers articles not be too
long. A discussion of "CSP the programming style" would most likely
fit better in a different article.
Also, please note that Wikipedia really isn't the right venue for
describing "common idioms that might attract practitioners" -
Wikipedia articles aren't meant to be howto manuals, and the
Wikipedia community tends to frown on active promotion or
advertising. Something on common idioms might be better placed in a
Wikibook ( http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Main_Page ). That'd also give
you more scope for getting into detail, or showing examples from
different languages. In fact, a community-written textbook on the CSP
approach to programming might be a really useful resource, and a
great way of preserving the lessons learned by the old occam community.