[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A path for CSP-based
> The key point I was trying to make was not "enemy action" stuff, but
> information problems due to conflicting definitions.
> >A while back, Larry wrote:
> >> I know we have to fight against the fact that "component" has already
> > ^^^^^!!!!
> >I would advice NOT to FIGHT, but to EXPLOIT. These people are heading
> >in the right direction, and we should PULL them further towards CSP
I did not mean to point my finger specifically at Larry.
I wanted to make a general point.
- OO is a religion.
- It looks to me like CSP can easily become a religion for
Giving people the feeling that you think CSP is a religion
will work strongly against you.
Therefore: If you love CSP, and want to make it rule the world
- Beware to stay realistic: also CSP has weaker points.
- Beware not to be too emotional...