Re: Priority revisited: a new primitive

[A E Lawrence <adrian.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Gerald H. Hilderink" wrote:

...


> 
> If each PAR PRI construct can be expressed by a PAR-PRIALT construct then
> the PAR PRI could be useful and powerful to specify priority in my
> application and the PAR-PRIALT construct could formalise the scheduling
> behaviour of my application by using FDR (tool stuff).

Quick note: I don't think that FDR can handle priority. At least not
directly. But I may be wrong. 

Adrian
-- 
Dr A E Lawrence