[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Priority revisited: a new primitive

To: Occam-com mail group <occam-com@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Priority revisited: a new primitive
From: A E Lawrence <adrian.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:24:38 +0100
Cc: g.h.hilderink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: Not much
References: <IAECKGBHMIOJJEOHMOEBMEBPCBAA.g.h.hilderink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <39E3D6C0.C442CE43@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <39E3DB7C.82E6DAAE@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

A E Lawrence wrote:

>   SEQ
>     PAR
>       P1
>       P2
>       ...
>       P3
      done

Obvious correction to the two examples:- indentation wrong for "done". 
There, I said that I should have used folding!

Adrian
-- 
Dr A E Lawrence

References:
- Re: Priority revisited: a new primitive
  - From: A E Lawrence
- Re: Priority revisited: a new primitive
  - From: A E Lawrence

Prev by Date: Re: Priority revisited: a new primitive
Next by Date: RE: Priority revisited: a new primitive
Previous by thread: Re: Priority revisited: a new primitive
Next by thread: Re: Priority revisited: a new primitive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread