[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Occam vs Transputers

To: occam-com@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Occam vs Transputers
From: Sture Carlson <sture.carlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 14:39:18 +0200
Organization: Saab Dynamics AB
References: <E13cRfg-0001OY-00@mercury>
Reply-to: sture.carlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dear sirs,
I have now been a member of the Occam mailing group for a while,
but I have still not seen any discussions concerning Occam.
We are using Occam in a Transputer system, but it seems that 
noone is using this combination any more.

Please remove me from the Occam (and Java-threads?) mailing list. 

-- 
Hälsningar/Best regards  Sture Carlson 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sture Carlson, Senior Systems Engineer  Tel. +46 13 18 65 64
Saab Dynamics AB                        FAX: +46 13 18 64 26 
SE-581 88  LINKOPING, Sweden   mailto:Sture.Carlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Action language semantics
  - From: Oyvind Teig

Prev by Date: Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
Next by Date: Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection"
Previous by thread: Action language semantics
Next by thread: TCPP and IPDPS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread