RE: Parallel Concurrency in Real-Time

["Campbell, John" <John.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Hi 
> The "UG" in WoTUG is a distinct handicap for me in obtaining funding.
> Anything that smacks of "user's group" appears to my management to
> have reduced merit. -jc
	I see that I didn't make it clear that I was referring to the
conference
	rather than the web site.   But they really should the same name.  I
	would vote for something like "Low Latency Parallelism" since, for
the
	most part we're not as concerned with response time bounds as the 
	real-time community is. -jc

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Ruth Ivimey-Cook [SMTP:Ruth.Ivimey-Cook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent:	Saturday, October 23, 1999 4:01 AM
> > To:	occam-com@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject:	Re: Parallel Concurrency in Real-Time
> > 
> > Folks,
> > 
> > My opinions:
> > 
> >  * I have no problem changing Parallel for Concurrency in our literature
> > (web site, etc)
> > 
> >  * I am less sure about "headlining" Real Time, for the reasons which
> > Larry
> > has explained. We could make more of it though.
> > 
> >  * Something needs to change: WoTUG is dying, IMO.
> > 
> >  * I do have a problem with changing the name WoTUG.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Ruth
> > 
> > 
> > 
>