[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Parallel Concurrency in Real-Time
> The "UG" in WoTUG is a distinct handicap for me in obtaining funding.
> Anything that smacks of "user's group" appears to my management to
> have reduced merit. -jc
I see that I didn't make it clear that I was referring to the
rather than the web site. But they really should the same name. I
would vote for something like "Low Latency Parallelism" since, for
most part we're not as concerned with response time bounds as the
real-time community is. -jc
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ruth Ivimey-Cook [SMTP:Ruth.Ivimey-Cook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 1999 4:01 AM
> > To: occam-com@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Parallel Concurrency in Real-Time
> > Folks,
> > My opinions:
> > * I have no problem changing Parallel for Concurrency in our literature
> > (web site, etc)
> > * I am less sure about "headlining" Real Time, for the reasons which
> > Larry
> > has explained. We could make more of it though.
> > * Something needs to change: WoTUG is dying, IMO.
> > * I do have a problem with changing the name WoTUG.
> > Regards,
> > Ruth