[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inline VALOF
Denis A Nicole wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Adam Sampson wrote:
>>- used inline VALOF in real code at all?
>>- found interesting uses for inline VALOF (that can't be obtained as
>> elegantly using named FUNCTIONs)?
> Won't taking VALOF out upset the BCPL community? I think we once supported
> mixed occam1/BCPL on the Atari ST and maybe the Sinclair QL.
> More seriously, could occam-pi support something like the B ? E : E'
> syntax of C and Java or the E if B else E' of Python 2.5? It might be an
> appropriate replacement.
Would this not violate the "razor"? Quite apart from my instinctive