RE: TechEd 2006 -- "parallelism is the new OO": JCSP vs KRoC...

["Eric Verhulst" <eric.verhulst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Where can I find these benchmarks ? How did you take into account the
effects of the cache ?

We have also a version of OpenComRTOS running on Windows and I would like to
compare. 


----------------------  FROM : --------------------------
   Eric.Verhulst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   Skype me at: ericverhulstskype
   Mob. +32 477 608339
   Systematic Systems Development Methodologies
   Trustworthy Embedded Components
   http://www.OpenLicenseSociety.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
" "Concept" is a vague concept", L. Wittgenstein 


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-occam-com@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-occam-com@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Dyke Stiles
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 9:16 PM
To: occam-com@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: TechEd 2006 -- "parallelism is the new OO": JCSP vs KRoC...

Greetings -

Mario and I just did an extensive comparison on the performance of JCSP.net
and KRoC.net (pony) - and they differed only by a few %.
(The machine on which I have the exact numbers is being resurrected - I
hope; details maybe at CPA 2006??)

Dyke.

Chalmers, Kevin wrote:

>> ... 
> 
> The performance is fairly reasonable on a decent machine, considering 
> the benefits of portability and mobility that you get.  It's by no 
> means up KRoC, C++CSP, or the Transterpreter speeds however.  It may 
> actually be a time to re-examine JCSP and see if it can be improved 
> considering how far Java has gone in that time.  Maybe some of the 
> known issues have been addressed?
> 
>  
> ...

--
============================================================================
====
Dyke Stiles			               Reply to:
dyke.stiles@xxxxxxxxxxx
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Utah State University
4120 Old Main Hill
Logan UT 84322-4120
Phone: +1-435-2840
FAX:   +1-435-797-3054
============================================================================
====