[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?

Subject: Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
From: Mario Schweigler <ms44@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:28:17 +0200
Cc: java-threads@xxxxxxxxxx, occam-com@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:32:31 +0100
Envelope-to: ats1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <32883.66.93.33.5.1151279409.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx> <000901c6993f$6efa88e0$0e00a8c0@sherlock> <2920.66.93.33.5.1151346419.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx> <31f2a7bd0606261206n2f03c81cw83f78d7ade662297@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-occam-com@xxxxxxxxxx

> Is it time to unhitch Java-Threads from this discussion?

Actually, merging them into one might be the better solution. What about
setting up a "wotug-com" list?

Mario

References:
- RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  - From: tjoccam
- RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  - From: Ruth Ivimey-Cook
- RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
  - From: tjoccam

Prev by Date: RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
Next by Date: Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
Previous by thread: RE: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
Next by thread: Re: Is OO a deliberate fraud?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread