[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CELL processors considered interesting?

To: occam-com@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: CELL processors considered interesting?
From: Ruth Ivimey-Cook <Ruth.Ivimey-Cook@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:37:46 +0000
Delivery-date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:38:33 +0000
Envelope-to: phw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4215826B.7060205@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <ALEIIIDMHMOPHNDMOFKJAEDLDNAA.eric.verhulst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4215826B.7060205@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-occam-com@xxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 11:21 +0530, Tom Locke wrote:
> Anyone got any background on that architecture?

Try wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burroughs_B5000

Ruth
-- 
Ruth Ivimey-Cook <ruth@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- RE: CELL processors considered interesting?
  - From: Eric Verhulst OLS
- Re: CELL processors considered interesting?
  - From: Tom Locke

Prev by Date: Re: CELL processors considered interesting?
Next by Date: RE: CELL processors considered interesting?
Previous by thread: Re: CELL processors considered interesting?
Next by thread: RE: CELL processors considered interesting?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread