Re: OO&CSP

[ianeast <ianeast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>1) Dynamic object interactions: the need for dynamic alphabets and channel 
>passing: pi&pict vav csp&occam
>2) splitting the csp atom: opening up event atomicity in going from 
>specification to implementation
>3) Meta-csp: modeling imperative implementations using the visibility of 
>ready sets and manipulating the fdr firing rules
>4) MAXCHICKENS=3: Why do humans need to set the limits in CSP models, are 
>there cases where FDR could work it out for a given subset of proofs?
>(Can you see that it is the tension between mathematical cleaness and ease 
>of commercial applicability that is most interesting to me)
>5) How about Milner's bigraphs etc 
How about process inheritance?

Ian


Dr. Ian Robert East                                 ireast@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
School for Computing and Mathematical Sciences
Oxford Brookes University
Wheatley Campus
Oxford OX33 1HX

Consultation hours for Academic Year 2001/2 Term 2
Wed 09.00..11.00; 14.00..16.00