[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inheritance that can add/remove and new occam?
> Marcel wrote:
> > I get the impression that your approach is wrong in the first
> > place... no offence... or... I guess you are trying to do
> > dynamic stuff, whereas Occam isn't dynamic...
> As I have "proved" earlier: occam is more "dynamic" than some people
> here like to believe. And no, of course my approach is not wrong:
> it's basic Darwinism:-] I live by this, and have to reuse things!
> And the old functionality isn't always 100% what I want now,
> but I do want the _same_ source files (although modified, with
> side-effects into old user, probably bad, but yes, I live by it!)
> (I know, Darwinism is debatable!)
Sure, us "industrialists" have to live with what we have got...
Or: make a revolutionary change into a direction that is proven to
be A LOT better, and have a lot of money.