[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: occam 2.1 / 2.5 definition

"B.M. Cook" wrote:

> Does anyone have a (pointer to) a copy of the occam 2.1 (for a time called
> 2.5) definition?
> I'm sure I used to have a paper copy - but can't find it anywhere.
> I'd like to check whether my current compiler goes as far as 2.1 (it is
> beyond 2, but not as advanced as 3).

See http://www.hensa.ac.uk/parallel/occam/documentation/index.html