"B.M. Cook" wrote: > Does anyone have a (pointer to) a copy of the occam 2.1 (for a time called > 2.5) definition? > > I'm sure I used to have a paper copy - but can't find it anywhere. > > I'd like to check whether my current compiler goes as far as 2.1 (it is > beyond 2, but not as advanced as 3). See http://www.hensa.ac.uk/parallel/occam/documentation/index.html